Index of /ENSI

 Name                    Last modified      Size  Description
 Parent Directory                             -   
 README.txt              27-Aug-2001 14:47  1.2K  
 bf-implementors-epis..> 08-Mar-2003 18:17  4.2K  
 brainfuck-1.0.txt       27-Aug-2001 14:45  1.4K  
 brainfuck-1.2.txt       27-Aug-2001 14:00  3.0K  
 brainfuck-1.3.txt       14-Jan-2002 19:01  4.9K  
 brainfuck-rev--0.67.txt 29-Aug-2001 10:49  1.3K  
 golf-rules.txt          14-Aug-2002 12:05  2.2K  
 oss-framework-rfc-8...> 09-Sep-2001 16:32  3.1K  
 oss-streams-1.0.txt     28-Aug-2001 11:17  2.7K  
 oss-streams-addendvm..> 28-Aug-2001 14:29  827   
 wait-1.0.txt            27-Jun-2002 14:47  2.9K  

ENSI, the Esoteric Non-existent Standards Institute, now officially does
not exist in order to standardize unstandardized standardizable things.
This is important for the development of non-standard-compliance in
esoteric languages.

ENSI currently has one (for some odd reason) existant member, 203
non-existant members and 3 members that we know exist, but deny it.

Feel free to join ENSI (at a rate of 2000 Zorkmids per year)!

This document specifies a draft proposal for a standardized brainfuck as
worked out by the non-existant subcommitee XYZZY-1234.

Meetings are held every first Kermet-The-Frog-Day of a month. Registration
costs are 420 Zorkmids.

> The point is after all to have a standard to NOT comply to.

It doesn't disturb me, however, if there happened to be some program that
is ENSI compliant. How about saying that "no program can be ENSI
compliant" but actually allowing them to be?

> ENSI currently has one (for some odd reason) existant member, 203
> non-existant members and 3 members that we know exist, but deny it.

I propose we take all communities with zero members to be automatically
members of ENSI. This has the nice side-effect of creating a paradox if
(when?) ENSI loses all its members.